?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Do you use underscore for italics / emphasis?
querki
jducoeur wrote in querki_project
Quick poll of the audience.

QText is, as I've mentioned before, based on Markdown. As it happens, Markdown has two different mechanisms for producing italics: you can either surround something *with asterisks* or _with underscores_. Personally, I never, ever, use the underscore version. Indeed, that's not what I expect underscores to do -- if anything, I'd expect them to produce underlining instead. And regardless, the underscores in Querki are currently a pain in my tuchus since we use underscore as the leading character for most system identifiers. The result is that, in the documentation, it all-too-frequently winds up interpreting those underscores in names as emphasis, and turns things italic by accident.

At the very least, I need to make the parser smarter, so that it doesn't interpret an underscore after a space as end-italics. But I think I'd actually rather just remove underscore from the language entirely: it's causing problems for no particularly obvious benefit. Providing multiple ways to do the same fairly arbitrary thing doesn't actually seem like a huge win unless people intuitively use it, and I don't actually see it in the wild very often nowadays.

Hence the question: do *you* use _this form_ for italics with any frequency? Is it something you expect that you would commonly use? I'm willing to leave it in if folks actually use it to a non-trivial degree, but "because we can" is not a reason to write a feature, or even to leave one in, and I long since decided that full Markdown compatibility is *not* a priority...
Tags:

  • 1
G+ uses underscores for italics and asterisks for bold. I use them quite frequently. I'm always confused by other wikis that have seemingly varying syntax for italics and bolding - which just makes me crazy.

  • 1